
Defense contractor revolutionizes software delivery processes

1. Refine the scope
- Not enough time to focus on quality feature delivery
- Strategy and execution functions overlap
- Predictability and alignment suffer as a result
2. Measure what matters
- Feature-point focus may be perceived as a measure of effort
- Individual performance vs team delivery
3. Adopt product thinking
- Unclear who is driving the roadmap vs who has influence
- Limited interaction/empathy between user customers and delivery teams
- Lacking target market for fast feedback and advocacy
Invoke a sense of purpose

The primary mission was to help this client build the operational model, individual skills, and delivery practices necessary to become a more predictable software delivery program. An initial assessment identified the relative lack of perceived purpose within the team as a primary driver of poor predictability and, ultimately, low customer satisfaction.
A new software delivery paradigm
From there, the following working hypothesis guided the initial consultation:
Given a dynamic network of high-performing teams,
When the delivery teams are aligned on the product vision & roadmap,
This client will consistently deliver high-quality, valuable solutions.
Make the work matter more
Enter Sketch
Agile software delivery practices

Increase reach and engagement
After the initial assessment, Sketch employed a broad array of strategies and services to help this client evolve its software delivery practices:

Measurable improvements to software delivery
Fast software development results
In only one quarter, the client achieved average improvements of 10-20% in each of the following categories:
- Overall value produced from each product increment
- Rate of on-time feature development before the target delivery date
- Sufficient time (as reported by team members) to innovate and learn new things during each sprint
Faster software development teams
Making the delivery process more effective produced measurable outcomes in further categories, too, including speed to market and product quality.
Areas of focus
In the course of this engagement, the team identified 15 near-term objectives, 5 core capabilities, and 9 critical program risks to focus on. All of the above were addressed successfully before the expected delivery date.
ENGAGEMENT REVIEW
“This team can finally assign quantifiable metrics to capacity, engineering quality, and innovation. Between better progress tracking and implementing the WeightedShortest Job First (WSJF) prioritization method, feature delivery is faster than ever.”