Why You Shouldn't Use Terraform: Top Terraform Alternatives for 2026

Terraform has long been the default choice for infrastructure-as-code, but it's time to reconsider. While Terraform pioneered the IaC space, it comes with significant drawbacks that modern alternatives have solved. Security vulnerabilities in HCL's state management, limited type safety, and a cumbersome development experience make Terraform increasingly difficult to justify — especially when better options exist.

In this guide, we'll explore why Terraform falls short and introduce you to two superior alternatives: AWS CDK and Pulumi. You'll learn when to choose each tool and how to migrate away from Terraform's limitations.

Terraform Alternatives

Terraform vs. CDK

AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) is Amazon's primary answer to infrastructure-as-code, and it addresses Terraform's core weaknesses head-on.

The Language Problem

With Terraform, developers face a double learning curve. First, they must understand AWS services, networking, IAM policies, and cloud architecture. Then, they must learn HCL — a domain-specific language used nowhere else in their stack (see "Bonus Tidbit" below). CDK eliminates this friction entirely by letting you write infrastructure in TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, or Go. Your team already knows these languages, and they can leverage existing skills, libraries, and tooling.

Type Safety and IDE Support

HCL offers minimal compile-time validation. You won't discover errors until terraform apply fails — often after waiting minutes for the plan phase. CDK provides full IDE autocomplete, inline documentation, and compile-time type checking. Catch errors before deployment, not during.

AWS-Native Integration

CDK is built by AWS for AWS. You get same-day support for new services, and seamless integration with AWS tooling. More importantly, CDK's L2 and L3 constructs are built with the AWS Well-Architected Framework principles baked in — security, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimization, and operational excellence are defaults, not afterthoughts. With Terraform, developers must manually research and implement each best practice through multiple resource blocks, configuration parameters, and policy attachments. CDK handles this complexity for you.

Testing and Software Engineering

Because CDK uses real programming languages, you can write unit tests with standard frameworks, implement modular patterns, and apply software engineering best practices. Test your infrastructure logic before deployment using the same tools your team uses for application code.

When to Choose CDK

If you're building exclusively on AWS and want the tightest integration with AWS services, CDK is the clear winner. It's particularly powerful for teams already using TypeScript or Python in their application code. And because CDK constructs have best practices baked in, you can have more secure, cost-optimized, performant, and resilient infrastructures.

Bonus Tidbit

Terraform (Hashicorp) recognized that their HCL was a problem and forked CDK creating CDKtf, or "CDK-Terraform". It allows developers to write IaC using TypeScript, Python, Go, C#, and Java, and through transpiling, the output is a Terraform stack that can be used with standard terraform plan and terraform apply commands. Unfortunately, CDKtf was fraught with incompatibility issues with their own HCL, and often times required employing "escape hatches" as a workaround for the incompatibilities. In the end, after just over five years of development on the project, Hashicorp pulled the plug on CDKtf without any advanced notice. Our next Terraform alternative, Pulumi, had a lot to say about this topic.

Terraform vs. Pulumi

Pulumi takes a different approach than CDK — it's cloud-agnostic while still delivering the developer experience Terraform lacks.

Multi-Cloud Without Compromise

Unlike CDK's AWS focus, Pulumi supports AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and 150+ providers. If you're building multi-cloud infrastructure or need to manage non-AWS resources alongside AWS, Pulumi handles it all with the same programming model. While Terraform also supports multiple providers, you're still constrained by HCL's limitations regardless of which cloud you're targeting.

Real Programming Languages, Real Power

Like CDK, Pulumi uses TypeScript, Python, Go, C#, and Java. You get access to the entire ecosystem of each language: npm packages, pip libraries, testing frameworks, and package managers. Need to call an API during deployment? Parse JSON? Implement complex logic? Use standard libraries and tools you already know. In Terraform, you're limited to HCL's primitive functions and awkward workarounds.

State Management and Security

While Terraform Cloud has improved state management, Pulumi's approach is more developer-friendly from the start. Pulumi encrypts secrets by default and offers managed state through Pulumi Cloud with less operational complexity. The fundamental difference: Pulumi was designed with modern security practices in mind, while Terraform's state management evolved as an afterthought.

When to Choose Pulumi

Choose Pulumi for multi-cloud environments, when you need maximum flexibility, or when your team values the full power of general-purpose programming languages. It's ideal for organizations that want to avoid cloud vendor lock-in while maintaining a superior developer experience.

Getting the Benefits of IaC

Regardless of which tool you choose, infrastructure-as-code delivers transformative benefits over manual cloud management:

Version Control and Collaboration

Your infrastructure lives in Git alongside your application code. Track changes, review pull requests, and roll back deployments with confidence. No more "who changed that security group?" or "why was the firewall opened on port XYZ?" mysteries — all changes are tied to code commits, which are also hopefully tied to user stories or change tickets, but that's a topic for another day.

Repeatability and Consistency

Define infrastructure once, deploy it everywhere. Development, staging, and production environments stay in sync. When your QA team and stakeholders test applications in lower environments, they're also validating the infrastructure that will run in production — eliminating configuration drift and "works on my machine" problems before they reach customers.

Automation and Speed

IaC enables you to integrate infrastructure provisioning directly into your CI/CD pipelines, treating infrastructure changes with the same rigor as application code. When a pull request is merged, your pipeline can automatically provision a complete environment—networking, compute, storage, and security configurations—in a fraction of the time manual provisioning would require. This automation reduces human error and allows your infrastructure team to focus on architecture and optimization rather than repetitive deployment tasks. As your organization grows, you can provision more environments without proportionally increasing headcount.

Special Offer for Cloud Enthusiasts: Get a Free Cloud Advantage Review

Documentation as Code

Your IaC definitions are living documentation. New team members can read the code to understand your architecture — how services connect, what security policies are in place, and why certain design decisions were made. Unlike traditional documentation that becomes stale the moment it's written, your infrastructure code is always current because it represents the actual deployed state. Comments in the code can explain the "why" behind architectural choices, while the code itself documents the "what" and "how." This eliminates the common problem of outdated wiki pages, scattered Confluence documents, or tribal knowledge that walks out the door when team members leave.

Learn More About IaC:

• What is Infrastructure as Code? - AWS overview of IaC fundamentals
• Infrastructure as Code Best Practices - AWS DevOps guidance
• What is Modern Infrastructure as Code? - Pulumi's perspective on modern IaC

Getting Started with IaC on AWS

Ready to move beyond Terraform? Here's how to begin your journey with modern infrastructure-as-code on AWS.

Start with CDK for AWS-Only Projects

If your infrastructure is primarily or exclusively on AWS, CDK is the fastest path to success. Install the CDK CLI, choose your preferred language (TypeScript and Python have the best support), and follow the official CDK Workshop to build your first stack. You'll be productive within hours, not days.

Choose Pulumi for Multi-Cloud Flexibility

For multi-cloud or hybrid environments, start with Pulumi's Getting Started guide. Pick your language, connect your cloud accounts, and deploy your first resources. Pulumi's documentation is excellent, and the learning curve is a lot less steep if you're already familiar with your chosen programming language.

Migration Strategy

Don't feel pressured to rewrite everything at once. Both CDK and Pulumi can import existing resources, including those managed by Terraform. Start with new projects or isolated components, prove the value, then gradually migrate critical infrastructure as your team builds confidence.

Key First Steps

1. Set up your development environment with the CDK or Pulumi CLI
2. Configure AWS credentials and choose a state management approach
3. Build a simple proof-of-concept (a VPC, S3 bucket, or Lambda function)
4. Establish testing and CI/CD patterns early
5. Document your team's conventions and best practices

Additional Resources

• AWS CDK Developer Guide
• Pulumi Documentation
• AWS Well-Architected Framework

The infrastructure-as-code landscape has evolved. Terraform served its purpose, but CDK and Pulumi represent the future — better security, superior developer experience, and the power of real programming languages. Choose the tool that fits your cloud strategy, and start building infrastructure the modern way.

If you run into problems, you can always contact Sketch.